Skip to content
SENSOLYTICA
Drafts as at 12 October 2026. General information only, not legal advice. These documents have not yet been reviewed by a solicitor and may change before the platform goes live. Take your own professional advice before relying on them.
Template

Data protection impact assessment

For an authority putting a shore node or drive units to work. Monitoring a public place is high-risk processing, so this is done before the first node goes live.

What this is

A starting point, not a finished assessment. The facts about how Sensolytica works are filled in. The judgements are your authority's: your data protection officer decides them and signs the assessment off.

Filled in by Sensolytica
22 facts about the product, as built
For your authority to judge
29 answers only you can give

Who is completing this

The authority is the controller. Sensolytica is a processor acting on its instructions.

Authority
Completed by, name and role
Data protection officer
Date started

Is a DPIA required?

Our reading of UK GDPR Article 35 and the ICO's list. Your DPO confirms it.

Filled in by Sensolytica
  • Systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible place, using automated recognition. That alone usually requires a DPIA.
  • Vessel names and registration marks are personal data when they can be linked to a person, which they often can.
  • Evidence may be used in enforcement, which affects people's rights.
Your conclusion, and who reached it

The processing

Your deployment, in your own words.

Sites and zones
Number of shore nodes and drive units
Hours of operation
Why this location

What is collected

What the units record, as built.

Filled in by Sensolytica
DataHeld whereKept for
A clip of about 10 seconds and up to six key framesEncrypted object storage, UKYour retention setting, 24 months by default
Radar speed and a vision estimate per objectDatabase, UK regionWith the capture
Vessel name or registration mark, when legibleDatabase, UK regionAnonymised after 30 days for passes within the limit
Drive unit readings from the outboard's motor controller: rpm, current, voltage, temperatures, faults, run time, position with GPS accuracyDatabase, UK regionWith the record
Who set each verdict, and whyAudit trail7 years

What is not collected

Filled in by Sensolytica
  • No facial recognition and no biometric identification of people.
  • No audio.
  • No continuous recording: a shore node records only when something moves through the zone.
  • No linking to any other register by Sensolytica. If your authority does that, it belongs in this assessment as your processing.

Lawful basis

For a public authority this is normally public task, not consent.

Lawful basis relied on
The statutory power you rely on
Article 9 condition, if any

Necessity and proportionality

What else you tried, and why this is in proportion.

Alternatives considered
Why this is proportionate
How people are told: signage, your website
How someone objects or asks for their data

Risks

Three risks that apply to every deployment are seeded with what the product does about them. You score them and add your own.

Risks and measures filled in by SensolyticaScores for your authority to judge
RiskMeasure in the productLikelihoodSeverityResidual
A vessel is wrongly identified and someone is accused unfairlyA person confirms every breach against the frames before it counts; verdicts can be changed and every change is logged
Evidence is kept longer than neededRetention runs on a schedule, not by hand
Someone sees another organisation's dataEvery row is scoped to one organisation in the database; staff access needs a reason and is logged
Add a risk of your own

Measures already in place

Filled in by Sensolytica
  • Data stays in the United Kingdom, encrypted at rest.
  • Named accounts with roles; two-factor sign-in available to everyone.
  • Every reading sealed with SHA-256 and chained when it lands.
  • The on-site agent writes advisory notes only. It never sets a verdict.

Outcome and sign-off

Article 36 requires prior consultation with the ICO only if a high risk remains after the measures.

Residual risk: low, medium or high
ICO consultation needed?
Approved by
Date, and next review date
Template supplied by Sensolytica as a starting point. Draft as at 12 October 2026. General information, not legal advice; your authority remains responsible for its own assessment.